Posted on March 3, by Scott Alexander I have heard the following from a bunch of people, one of whom was me six months ago:
By Charlie Stross Being a guy who writes science fiction, people expect me to be well-informed about the current state of the field—as if I'm a book reviewer who reads everything published in my own approximate area.
This is a little like expecting a bus driver to have an informed opinion on every other form of four-wheeled road-going transport. Similarly, marketing folks keep sending me SF novels in the hope I'll read them and volunteer a cover quote.
But over the past decade I've found myself increasingly reluctant to read the stuff they send me: I have a vague sense of dyspepsia, as if I've just eaten a seven course banquet and the waiter is approaching me with a wafer-thin mint.
|Why Open Source Software / Free Software (OSS/FS, FOSS, or FLOSS)? Look at the Numbers!||How a liberal learned to respect conservative thinking and accept the fact that, yes, the right is happier than the left By Catherine Caldwell-Harris Photo by Jessica Scranton What It Means When You Dye Your Hair Purple Should a something information technology specialist, by all accounts a competent employee, be able to dye her long, wavy brown hair purple without getting grief from management? That question was at the heart of the conversation at a recent dinner for a group of intelligent and age-diverse women.|
|defmacro - The Nature of Lisp||But concerns loom about OS vendor profitability.|
|Vorticism.||I've spent hundreds of hours tracing down original works for verification as well as culling hundreds more new entries not on any other website.|
This isn't to say that I haven't read a lot of SF over the past several decades. While I'm an autodidact—there are holes in my background—I've read most of the classics of the field, at least prior to the s.
But about a decade ago I stopped reading SF short stories, and this past decade I've found very few SF novels that I didn't feel the urge to bail on within pages or a chapter or two at most. Including works that I knew were going to be huge runaway successes, both popular and commercially successful—but that I simply couldn't stomach.
It's not you, science fiction, it's me. Like everyone else, I'm a work in progress. I've changed over the years as I've lived through changing times, and what I focus on in a work of fiction has gradually shifted.
Meanwhile, the Why possibly language evolved essay in which I interpret a work of fiction has changed. And in the here and now, I find it really difficult to suspend my disbelief in the sorts of worlds other science fiction writers are depicting. About a decade ago, M. John Harrison whose stories and novels you should totally read, if you haven't already wrote on his blog: Every moment of a science fiction story must represent the triumph of writing over worldbuilding.
Worldbuilding literalises the urge to invent. Worldbuilding gives an unnecessary permission for acts of writing indeed, for acts of reading. Worldbuilding numbs the reader's ability to fulfil their part of the bargain, because it believes that it has to do everything around here if anything is going to get done.
Above all, worldbuilding is not technically necessary. It is the great clomping foot of nerdism. It is the attempt to exhaustively survey a place that isn't there.
A good writer would never try to do that, even with a place that is there. I recognize the point he's putting in play here: The implicit construction of an artificial but plausible world is what distinguishes a work of science fiction from any other form of literature.
It's an alternative type of underpinning to actually-existing reality, which is generally more substantial and less plausible—reality is under no compulsion to make sense.
Note the emphasis on implicit, though. Worldbuilding is like underwear: Worldbuilding is the scaffolding that supports the costume to which our attention is directed. Without worldbuilding, the galactic emperor has no underpants to wear with his new suit, and runs the risk of leaving skidmarks on his story.
Storytelling is about humanity and its endless introspective quest to understand its own existence and meaning.
But humans are social animals. We exist in a context provided by our culture and history and relationships, and if we're going to write a fiction about people who live in circumstances other than our own, we need to understand our protagonists' social context—otherwise, we're looking at perspective-free cardboard cut-outs.
And technology and environment inextricably dictate large parts of that context. You can't write a novel of contemporary life in the UK today without acknowledging that almost everybody is clutching a softly-glowing fondleslab that grants instant access to the sum total of human knowledge, provides an easy avenue for school bullies to get at their victims out-of-hours, tracks and quantifies their relationships badlyand taunts them constantly with the prospect of the abolition of privacy in return for endless emotionally inappropriate cat videos.
We're living in a world where invisible flying killer robots murder wedding parties in Kandahar, a billionaire is about to send a sports car out past Mars, and loneliness is a contagious epidemic. We live with constant low-level anxiety and trauma induced by our current media climate, tracking bizarre manufactured crises that distract and dismay us and keep us constantly emotionally off-balance.
These things are the worms in the heart of the mainstream novel of the 21st century. You don't have to extract them and put them on public display, but if they aren't lurking in the implied spaces of your story your protagonists will strike a false note, alienated from the very society they are supposed to illuminate.
Now for a personal perspective. I don't find other peoples' motivations intuitively obvious: I have to apply conscious reasoning to put myself in a different head-space. I am quite frequently alienated by my fellow humans' attitudes and outlook. I strongly suspect I have mild ASD.I have long called myself a social conservative.
I think it is very important to have standards for behaviour (etiquette) and defined roles. The problems with this system is not that it exists, but the lack of flexibility and the value placed on them.
As editor of the Jargon File and author of a few other well-known documents of similar nature, I often get email requests from enthusiastic network newbies asking (in effect) "how can I learn to be a wizardly hacker?".
Back in I noticed that there didn't seem to be any other FAQs or web documents that addressed this vital question, so I started this one. Aug 02, · The Food Network can now be seen in nearly million American homes and on most nights commands more viewers than any of the cable news channels.
Appendix: Power As an illustration of what I mean about the relative power of programming languages, consider the following problem. We want to write a function that generates accumulators-- a function that takes a number n, and returns a function that takes another number i and returns n incremented by i.
February When we were in junior high school, my friend Rich and I made a map of the school lunch tables according to popularity. This was easy to do, because kids only ate lunch with others of .
Changes in language have occurred throughout centuries over a short period of time and have evolved through different degrees of English such as old English, middle English, and modern English. However, old English wasn't the first form of English created, but it's the foundation of our modern day English.